Revealed: Hillary Clinton’s Hypocrisy and the Media’s Bias

Emails leaked so far detail shocking allegations of Hillary Clinton’s hypocrisy and the corporate media’s blatant bias:

WikiLeaks: It’s no surprise, and certainly no accident, that the now-infamous 11-year-old videotape of a potty-mouthed Donald Trump sexually bragging like a poorly raised pubescent teen should surface when it did. It managed to eclipse a far-bigger story — the one about the emails revealing Hillary’s unbelievable hypocrisy and the media’s ongoing bias.

Leaked comments by Hillary Clinton in speeches made to Wall Street banks and major corporations in 2013 and 2014 — speeches that over the years netted her a cool $22 million in “speaking fees” — reveal that, while publicly pretending to sympathize with Occupy Wall Street and other far-left groups, Clinton was in fact quite cozy with the people she supposedly reviled.

What Hillary Clinton said in public bore little resemblance to what she said in private.

For instance, Hillary Clinton in recent months has emerged as a major foe of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the 12-nation free-trade deal that President Obama has pushed hard to get passed. Clinton has opposed the deal since October 2015. But she once called TPP “the gold standard of trade agreements.” So Americans have become confused.

But excerpts of her speech show little confusion on her part — just pure, rank hypocrisy. Speaking to the powerful investment bankers and industrialists, she noted how it was important for a politician to have a “public” stance, and a “private” stance on some key issues.

“I mean, politics is like sausage being made,” she said in a 2013 speech to the National Multi-Housing Council.

“If everybody’s watching, you know, all of the backroom discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least,” she said in the speech transcript. “So, you need both a public and a private position.”

In other words, you need to lie to the public:

But speaking to a Brazilian bank in 2013, she pushed for “open trade and open borders.”

“My dream is a hemispheric common market,” she said, “with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it …”

And here’s what Hillary Clinton purportedly said about certain “groups” of immigrants:

Worse still, is an email purportedly from Hillary outlining her true beliefs about immigration. “The main reason behind successful immigration should be painfully obvious to even the most dimwitted of observers: Some groups of people are almost always highly successful given only half a chance (Jews, Hindus/Sikhs and Chinese people, for example), while others (Muslims, blacks and Roma, for instance) fare badly almost irrespective of circumstances.”

It goes without saying, this shocking racial and ethnic stereotyping if it indeed reflects Hillary’s thinking would doom a Republican candidate. The media so far haven’t even really reported it.

Russia’s Top Propagandist Waves the Nuke Card at Obama

The war of words between the U.S. and Russia over Syria just escalated chillingly:

A Russian news presenter, dubbed the “Kremlin’s chief propagandist”, has warned the United States any “impudent behaviour” towards Moscow could have “nuclear” implications.

Dmitry Kiselyov, who was appointed by Vladimir Putin to head the country’s government-owned news agency, made the warning on Monday night’s edition of his flagship current affairs programme Vesti Nedeli (News of the Week).

Relations between the two countries hit a new low on Friday after Washington accused Moscow of war crimes following a sustained bombardment of the besieged Syrian city Aleppo, where at least 250,000 people are still living in the rebel-held east of the city.

According to Kiselyov, there has recently been a  “radical change” in the relationship between Russia and the U.S.:

“The loud talk in Washington of a ‘Plan B’ for Syria. Everyone understands what this means: direct military force in Syria,” he said.

During Monday’s programme a Russian defence ministry spokesman also warned US bombers not to target the Syrian army. “We’ll shoot them down,” commented Mr Kiselyov.

Mr Kiselyov is a key part of Russia’s media operations and has been described as a “militant anti-Westerner” by Russian media and the county’s “chief propagandist”. He is also subject to Western sanctions.

In the past he has boasted that Russia was the only single country “genuinely capable of turning the USA into radioactive ash” and claimed last year: “In Syria, America stands on the side of the terrorist caliphate”.

Here’s the thing. Kiselyov wasn’t speaking off his own bat. It’s pretty certain that every word was first approved by the Kremlin.

Paul Ryan Vows to Never Again Campaign Alongside Donald Trump

It never rains but it pours:

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan dealt a hammer blow to Donald J. Trump’s presidential candidacy Monday, dashing any remaining semblance of party unity and inviting fierce backlash from his own caucus by announcing that he would no longer defend Mr. Trump’s candidacy.

Mr. Ryan’s stance drew an immediate rebuke from Mr. Trump, who posted on Twitter that Mr. Ryan should focus on governing instead of feuding with him.

But Mr. Ryan informed Republican lawmakers on a morning conference call that he would never again campaign alongside Mr. Trump and would dedicate himself instead to defending the party’s majority in Congress, according to five lawmakers who participated in the call and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Effectively conceding defeat for his party in the presidential race, Mr. Ryan said his most urgent task was ensuring that Hillary Clinton did not enter the White House with Democratic control of the House and Senate, two lawmakers said.

Hard-liners have reacted angrily to Ryan’s statement with one GOP lawmaker calling it an act of  cowardice and another asserting that ‘allowing Mrs. Clinton into the White House would end with fetuses being destroyed “limb from limb.”’

The Little People Have Had Enough — They Want Change

Brexit champion Nigel Farage writes:

There are fewer than 30 days to go before the US presidential election. It is a campaign which mirrors many of the arguments and conflicts that we have seen recently in British politics, especially during the recent referendum campaign. Essentially, this election is about continuity versus change, with huge doses of personal vitriol thrown in.

When I arrived at the Republican Party convention in Cleveland, Ohio, back in July, I was amazed at the reaction to me over the Brexit result. Normally we follow trends in America, not the other way round, but it was clear that many of the delegates saw Brexit as an aspiration for what they see as the Trump “revolution” against the Establishment. I met many others who were not delegates or political anoraks, who were also keen to talk about Brexit. A group of retired US Navy veterans told me we should have done it years ago. Others were less impressed and shouted at me in the streets. Indeed, this weekend while I was in St Louis, I received some proper abuse on the Washington University campus.

One thing is for certain: our referendum is being talked about the world over and it may well be the first kick-back against the status quo that leads to a popular revolt across the West. While Trump and Clinton may be the most unpopular presidential candidates ever, there has been a growing distrust of the political class. Just as in the UK, where cash for questions and the MPs’ expenses scandals lead to a chorus of uproar, the elites in Washington are seen as remote and detached.

Farage concludes:

I do not see the Brexit result in isolation. Instead, I believe we are witnessing a popular uprising against failed politics on a global scale. People want to vote for candidates with personality, faults and all. It is the same in the UK, America and much of the rest of Europe. The little people have had enough. They want change.

Hillary Clinton’s Dream Is a ‘Common Market With Open Trade and Open Borders’

According to ‘leaked emails of Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta, which were made public by WikiLeaks,’ Hillary Clinton said her “dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future . . .”

In her remarks to Banco Itau, Clinton also denounced the idea of putting up barriers to global trade, a statement which will likely raise concerns with grassroots and working-class voters in her own party. “We have to resist protectionism, other kinds of barriers to market access and to trade,” Clinton said.

Apparently it’s also her husband Bill Clinton’s dream:

In a 2003 speech delivered to Yale University, Bill Clinton called for the establishment of a “global community,” praised the “openness of our borders to immigrants,” and declared that America “has great obligations to open our borders.” Clinton said that he believes the formation [of] a “genuine global community” — complete with an “over-arching system” to regulate it — to be “the great mission of the 21st century.”

But here’s the duplicity of the Clintons:

Clinton’s campaign website promoted material insisting that the “claim that Hillary Clinton supports open borders” is “false” — even though, by Clinton’s own admission, “open borders” is her “dream.”

Clinton’s new pushback against publicly labeling herself as for “open borders” while clearly championing open border policies is perhaps related to the fact that increasing immigration levels is not a popular policy. According to Pew, an overwhelming 83 percent of the American electorate overall would like to see immigration levels frozen or reduced.

And here’s the duplicity of the corporate media:

Clinton’s newly revealed remarks are equally interesting in that they demonstrate corporate media’s failure to meaningfully examine or accurately report on Clinton’s immigration position.

Indeed, for months, while Republican nominee Donald Trump has repeatedly made the case that his opponent supports open borders, many in the media have denounced Trump’s assertion as false — without providing any substantive evidence to counter his claim.

For instance, Politifact, the Associated Press, CNN,, and The Washington Post have all tried to argue that it’s not true that Clinton supports open borders. In doing so, these “fact checkers” have demonstrated that they either don’t know what “open borders” means, or they are deliberately parroting talking points provided by the Clinton campaign to cover up Clinton’s record on the issue.

Interestingly, these so-called “fact checks” rarely mention how many migrants would be imported into the country under a Hillary Clinton Presidency. While Bill Clinton has described our current immigration policy as one of “open borders,” his wife has championed policies that would open our borders even further.

The Clintons’ advocacy of open borders is not shared by her primary rival Bernie Sanders who maintains that “open borders” ‘is a radical and fringe position supported by wealthy donors, which hurts working Americans.’

Is Trump’s Campaign Over?

Donald Trump, defiant as ever despite the “uproar over vulgar comments he made in 2005,” is adamant that he will never drop out of the presidential race.

But the odds of winning the race are turning against him:

Republicans are fleeing Donald Trump’s camp in droves as a firestorm of criticism over comments he made in a leaked recording continues.

Several prominent Republican figures and politicians have announced they’re withdrawing their support for the GOP presidential nominee since the recording surfaced Friday.

It remains to be seen whether Trump can defy the odds yet again and bounce rught back into contention as he has done so many times before.

Trump’s Lewd Conversation in 2005 About Women

The Donald has been in hot water before over his boorish behavior during this 2016 presidential race, but nothing so far tops The Washington Post’s bombshell report about a taped conversation he had in 2005 with Billy Bush, the nephew of former president George H.W. Bush:

Donald Trump bragged in vulgar terms about kissing, groping and trying to have sex with women during a 2005 conversation caught on a hot microphone, saying that “when you’re a star, they let you do it,” according to a video obtained by The Washington Post.

The video captures Trump talking with Billy Bush, then of “Access Hollywood,” on a bus with the show’s name written across the side. They were arriving on the set of “Days of Our Lives” to tape a segment about Trump’s cameo on the soap opera.

The tape includes audio of Bush and Trump talking inside the bus, as well as audio and video once they emerge from it to begin shooting the segment.

In that audio, Trump discusses a failed attempt to seduce a woman, whose full name is not given in the video.

“I moved on her, and I failed. I’ll admit it,” Trump is heard saying. It was unclear when the events he was describing took place. The tape was recorded several months after he married his third wife, Melania.

“Whoa,” another voice said.

“I did try and f— her. She was married,” Trump says.

Trump continues: “And I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping. She wanted to get some furniture. I said, ‘I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.’”

“I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,” Trump says. “Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.”

This just might be the end of Trump’s presidential race.

It’s not clear at this stage whether Mike Pence gets to step in as the GOP’s presidential candidate in the event that Trump withdraws. But if Pence were to take Trump’s place, it would probably leave Hillary Clinton with no chance whatsoever of winning the election.

China Is Considering Ways to Remove Kim Jong-un As North Korean Leader

Kim Jong-un may be overplaying his hand as North Korea prepares to carry out its sixth nuclear test to make it the third this year.

Now it appears its closest ally China has finally decided Kim Jong-un is a liability that can no longer be countenanced:

Chinese policy-makers are in talks about how to remove Kim Jong-un as leader of North Korea as new satellite images reveal preparations are underway for a sixth nuclear test.

They are also discussing supporting surgical strikes on the rogue state, said the China initiative director of Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs.

According to the Korea Times, Professor Zhe Sun told a security forum in Washington that the Chinese were debating how best to deal with the North Korean leader.

‘Some Chinese scholars and policy makers began to talk about supporting “surgical strikes” and “decapitation” by the U.S. and South Korea as one policy option,’ he said.

The Thuggishness of Hillary Clinton

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. — founder and editor in chief of The American Spectator and a New York Times best-selling author — writes that “there has always been an atmosphere of thuggishness” about Hillary Clinton.

She acts as though the rule of law doesn’t apply to her . . .

For instance, on the matter of the many women who have willingly or unwillingly been pulled into her husband’s lubricious ambit. How many times have you read or heard a quote attributed to her where she vows to “crush” a woman whom Bill rutted with or to “crucify” her. One even reads such quotes in the mainstream media (MSM). Yet she is portrayed as a champion of women.

Now, of course, today the matronly Hillary is long past her prime as a plausible Bruno. As she breaks out in coughing spells, and has to be propped up at the lectern in her heavily cushioned pantsuits, it is easy for us to have forgotten the intimidating specter she struck for such woman as Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, the young Monica or even Juanita Broaddrick, who allegedly was raped by smiling Bill. Yet in decades past she was a highly volatile figure and, in fact, posed a threat to White House personnel. There are all those witnesses who have reported seeing her bean her husband or members of the Secret Service with a book or a lamp. I think even the loyal George Stephanopoulos reported her aggression.

Bees learn from each other just like we do  

Bumblebees have a brain about 0.0002 percent the volume of ours. But that doesn’t mean they’re not smart. In fact, there’s a lot of intelligence packed into the infinitesimal brain of a bumblebee.

A recent experiment by scientists from the Queen Mary University of London shows that the “insects possess the essential cognitive elements for cultural transmission.” It’s actually “possible to teach a single bee a new trick, in other words, and a different bee can learn that behavior from her peer.”